NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and AMD Radeon HD 8750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
| Launch date | 29 May 2013 vs 26 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 620 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1483
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1483
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2263
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2263
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1615
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1615
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 vs 1483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 vs 1483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 1615 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1483 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1483 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2263 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2263 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1615 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1615 | 2221 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1009 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5747 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | Mars |
| Launch date | 29 May 2013 | 26 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1299 | 1300 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8750M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM
