NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Launch date | 29 May 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 1483
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 1483
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2263
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2263
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 1615
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 1615
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 vs 1483 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 vs 1483 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 vs 1615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 vs 1615 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1483 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1483 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2263 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2263 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1615 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1615 | 3235 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK107 |
Launch date | 29 May 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1302 | 1303 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |