NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 475 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 638.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1483 vs 1413
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1483 vs 1413
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2263 vs 1254
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2263 vs 1254
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1615 vs 865
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1615 vs 865
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 May 2013 vs 22 February 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 475 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 336 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 638.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1483 vs 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1483 vs 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2263 vs 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2263 vs 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1615 vs 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1615 vs 865 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
- Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 26.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1483 | 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1483 | 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2263 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2263 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1615 | 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1615 | 865 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1302 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5221 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.724 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.068 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.126 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.823 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GK208 | GF104 |
| Launch date | 29 May 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1299 | 1302 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
| Price now | $111.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.30 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 26.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8750M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM
