NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1615
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 2263
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1615
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 2263
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 29 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 2263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 2263 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 84% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1483 vs 1123
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1483 vs 1123
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 376.3 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1483 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1483 vs 1123 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 718 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 1483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 2263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 1483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 1615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 2263 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 29 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1298 | 1299 |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 376.3 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 20.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K610M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8750M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
