NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 920M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 6% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 902 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1483
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1615
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2263
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1483
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1615
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2263

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 March 2015 vs 29 May 2013
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 902 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1598 vs 1483
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3636 vs 1615
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2263
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1598 vs 1483
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3636 vs 1615
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 2263

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 14.43 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
2.3x better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt

Texture fill rate	14.43 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	692.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 33 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1598

1483

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3636

1615

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2263

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1598

1483

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3636

1615

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2263

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
PassMark - G3D Mark	717
PassMark - G2D Mark	119
Geekbench - OpenCL	3725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1598	1483
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3636	1615
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	2263
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1598	1483
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3636	1615
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	2263
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	326

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GK208B	GK208
Launch date	13 March 2015	29 May 2013
Place in performance rating	1300	1302
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz	902 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	692.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	14.43 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	25 Watt
Transistor count	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length		145 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers