NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 vs 536
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 176
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2448 vs 2012
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.25
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 929
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1210
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 1524
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 929
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1210
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 15 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 vs 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2448 vs 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 vs 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2448 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 1524 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF106 |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 15 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1436 | 1437 |
Price now | $99.21 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |