NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 140.06
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.502
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 9.613
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.696 vs 12.49
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 2073
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 2073

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 660 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 677 vs 626
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 187
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2442 vs 2070
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 5.068
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 1069
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1652
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 1069
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1652

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	626 677
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 2442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.068 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.562 140.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.384 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.696 12.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1069 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1069 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 2073

Compare specifications (specs)