NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 140.06
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.502
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 9.613
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.696 vs 12.49
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 2073
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 2073
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 vs 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 vs 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 vs 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 vs 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 vs 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 vs 2073 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 660 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 vs 625
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 187
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2448 vs 2085
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 5.068
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 1069
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1652
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 1069
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1652
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 vs 625 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2448 vs 2085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 vs 5.068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 vs 1069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 vs 1069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 | 676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2085 | 2448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1444 | 1445 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |