NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2073
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2073
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 March 2014 vs 15 May 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 vs 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 vs 2073 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 418
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 66
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 1607
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.403
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 140.06 vs 131.239
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 1076
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1833
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 1076
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 vs 418 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 66 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 vs 1607 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 vs 4.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 vs 131.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1607 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.403 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.239 | 140.06 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1076 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1076 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 | 2073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF117 | GF108 |
Launch date | 24 March 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1437 | 1440 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |