NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2073
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2073
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 24 March 2014 vs 15 May 2012
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3035 vs 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3035 vs 2073

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 738 MHz
  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 418
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 66
  • Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 1607
  • Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.403
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 140.06 vs 131.239
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 1076
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1833
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 1076
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1833
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 738 MHz
Texture fill rate 12.96 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines 96 vs 48
Floating-point performance 311.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 681 vs 418
PassMark - G2D Mark 225 vs 66
Geekbench - OpenCL 2473 vs 1607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.498 vs 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 140.06 vs 131.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1151 vs 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1853 vs 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1151 vs 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1853 vs 1833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
418
681
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
66
225
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1607
2473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.403
6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
131.239
140.06
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1076
1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1833
1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3035
2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1076
1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1833
1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3035
2073
Name NVIDIA GeForce 810M NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark 418 681
PassMark - G2D Mark 66 225
Geekbench - OpenCL 1607 2473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.403 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 131.239 140.06
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1076 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1833 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3035 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1076 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1833 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3035 2073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 12.49
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 170

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 810M NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Fermi
Code name GF117 GF108
Launch date 24 March 2014 15 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1437 1440
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $99.99
Price now $99.21
Value for money (0-100) 8.89

Technical info

Core clock speed 738 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 141.7 gflops 311.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 96
Texture fill rate 5.904 GTexel / s 12.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3