NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon HD 7650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.577 vs 3.699
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 226.218 vs 220.859
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.559 vs 0.375
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1706 vs 1042
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2983 vs 1949
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5586 vs 1733

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 32 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.624 vs 12.554
• 36.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1042 vs 28.9
• 40.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 48.1
• 17.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1733 vs 99.8

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.577 3.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.218 220.859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.559 0.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.554 44.624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1706 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2983 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5586 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.9 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.1 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.8 1733

Compare specifications (specs)