NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 3299
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1913
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 3299
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1913

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1206 vs 933
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 159
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3800 vs 2642
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 vs 8.493
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.824 vs 285.42
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 vs 0.863
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.773 vs 17.242
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.111 vs 19.116
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 1913
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 1913

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	933 1206
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	159 235
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2642 3800
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.493 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	285.42 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.863 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.242 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.116 23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 1913

Compare specifications (specs)