NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 3299
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1913
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 3299
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1913
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 22 March 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 1913 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 935
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 160
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3799 vs 2673
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 vs 8.493
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.824 vs 285.42
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 vs 0.863
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.773 vs 17.242
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.111 vs 19.116
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 1913
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 1913
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 vs 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3799 vs 2673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 vs 8.493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 vs 285.42 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 vs 0.863 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 vs 17.242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 vs 19.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 vs 1913 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 935 | 1201 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 235 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2673 | 3799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.493 | 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.42 | 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.863 | 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.242 | 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.116 | 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1213 | 1214 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 384 | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus |