AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 164
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3750 vs 2683
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.438 vs 8.493
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 285.42
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.991 vs 0.863
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 vs 17.242
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.338 vs 19.116

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

• Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 22.7 billion / sec vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 544.5 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 400 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 936 vs 856
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1494
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 2329
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1494
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 2329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	856 936
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 164
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3750 2683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.438 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	289.646 285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.991 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.794 17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.338 19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3341

Compare specifications (specs)