NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 672 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• 5.4x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5016 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.049 vs 2.747
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 342.738 vs 104.498
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.945 vs 0.27
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.549 vs 5.832
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.128 vs 9.69
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2550 vs 664
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1938 vs 1602
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3926 vs 2848

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 15.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 664 vs 43.2
• 51.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 31.3
• 40.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 70.1

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.049 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	342.738 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.945 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.549 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.128 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2550 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1938 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3926 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.2 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.3 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.1 2848

Compare specifications (specs)