NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 6.992 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 48 vs 20
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 167.8 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.608 vs 8.335

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 29 Watt
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 351
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 163
• Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 1367
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 3.15
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 vs 84.603
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.294
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 513
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 677
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1187
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 513
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 677
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1187

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	351 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	163 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1367 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.15 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.603 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.294 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.608 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	513 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	677 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1187 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	513 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	677 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1187 3044

Compare specifications (specs)