NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 192 vs 32
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 92.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 170
- 8.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 26
- 183.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 10
- 183.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 10
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 92.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 26 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 10 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1728 vs 1494
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1728 vs 1494
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1728 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1728 vs 1494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 26 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 10 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GK208B | G84 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1539 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 675 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 92.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
SLI |