NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 6.498
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 12.49
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 192 vs 170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 vs 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 vs 12.49 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 vs 170 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 623
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 212
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 1946
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 140.06 vs 100.391
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 vs 0.441
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 vs 8.146
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 977
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1494
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 1833
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 977
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1494
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 vs 8.146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | GF108 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $99.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1440 |
Price now | $34.99 | $99.21 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | 8.89 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 810 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |