NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 631 vs 426
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 189
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2224 vs 1161
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.418 vs 3.121
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.734 vs 109.787
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.158 vs 5.005
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.317 vs 8.55
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 895 vs 660
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 895 vs 660
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 vs 3 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 vs 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 vs 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 vs 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 vs 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 vs 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 vs 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 vs 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 vs 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 vs 660 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Around 2% higher maximum memory size: 1048 MB vs 1 GB or 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 vs 280
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1626 vs 519
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 vs 280
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1626 vs 519
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 1048 MB vs 1 GB or 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 1626 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | GF108 |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
Place in performance rating | 1590 | 1526 |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | 1048 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |