NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.734 vs 140.06
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.317 vs 12.49

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 631
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 208
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 2224
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.418
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 vs 0.395
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 vs 8.158
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 895
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 280
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 519
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 895
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 280
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 519

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	631 681
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	208 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2224 2473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.418 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.734 140.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.395 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.158 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.317 12.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	895 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	280 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	519 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	895 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	280 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	519 2073

Compare specifications (specs)