NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.734 versus 140.06
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.317 versus 12.49
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2014 versus 15 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 versus 12.49 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 versus 631
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 208
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 versus 2224
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 versus 4.418
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 versus 0.395
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 versus 8.158
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 895
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 280
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 versus 519
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 895
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 280
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 versus 519
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 12.75 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 versus 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 versus 2224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 versus 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 versus 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 versus 8.158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 versus 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 versus 519 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK208B | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49 | $99.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1590 | 1440 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $99.21 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.44 | 8.89 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 810 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB or 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |