NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 559
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 218
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 vs 1561
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 vs 4.278
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 vs 0.464
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1296
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 1044
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2716
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1296
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 1044
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2716
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 7 February 2011 |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 vs 1561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 vs 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 vs 0.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 2716 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 49 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 166.832
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 12.415
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 36.916
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 846 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 vs 36.916 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 vs 327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 1561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Thames |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 7 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $79 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1426 |
Price now | $54.99 | $49.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 19.92 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 716 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |