NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 624.0 gflops
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 559
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 218
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 versus 1561
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 4.278
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 versus 0.464
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1296
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1044
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 2716
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1296
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1044
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 2716
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 7 February 2011 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 624.0 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 versus 1561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 versus 0.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 2716 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.6 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 versus 166.832
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 versus 12.415
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 versus 36.916
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 846 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 versus 36.916 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 versus 327 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 1561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 846 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 7 February 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $79 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1426 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $49.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 19.92 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 40 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |