NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 11 November 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 602 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 62 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 994 vs 830
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 2902
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3324
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 vs 830 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 vs 2902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 62 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 15302 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $1,799 |
| Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1313 |
| Price now | $54.99 | $149.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 8.67 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7600G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M435DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 5
