NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

vs

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 14.43 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
• 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
• 7x better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 833 vs 173
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 252 vs 135
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2337
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2337

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Compare specifications (specs)