NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R5 230
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 14.43 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 833 vs 222
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 439
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 992
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2480
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 439
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 992
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2480
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 3 April 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 833 vs 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 2480 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 252
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 2900
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 252 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 vs 2900 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 833 | 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2900 | 4127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2480 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R5 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Caicos |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 3 April 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1312 |
Price now | $54.99 | $50 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 6.10 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 10.67 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay |