NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 320x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 vs 23.499
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 vs 23.499 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 830
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 253
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 2902
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 10.872
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 166.832
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.817
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 12.415
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1951
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1693
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1951
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1693
- Around 67% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 vs 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 vs 327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF108 | GK106 |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1003 |
Price now | $54.99 | $144.81 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 16.05 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |