NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 320x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 23.499
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 27 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 23.499 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 830
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 253
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 versus 2902
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 10.872
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 166.832
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.817
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 12.415
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1693
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1693
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 versus 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 327 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Nom de code | GF108 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $109 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1003 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $144.81 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 16.05 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 2,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |