NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 11.5 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
• 11x better floating-point performance: 552.2 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 812 vs 630
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.854 vs 10.385
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.631 vs 12.361
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1654 vs 988
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2370 vs 1702
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2808
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1654 vs 988
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2370 vs 1702
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2808

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 174
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2975
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 7.814
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 162.583
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.798

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	812 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	174 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2975 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.814 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.583 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.798 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.854 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.631 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1654 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2370 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1654 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2370 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2808

Compare specifications (specs)