NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 719 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 11.5 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 11x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 552.2 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 812 versus 630
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.854 versus 10.385
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.631 versus 12.361
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1654 versus 988
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2370 versus 1702
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2808
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1654 versus 988
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2370 versus 1702
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2808
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 March 2014 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.5 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 552.2 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 812 versus 630 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.854 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.631 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1654 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1654 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2808 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 174
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 2975
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 7.814
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 162.583
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.798
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 2975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 7.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 162.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.798 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 812 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2975 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.814 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.583 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.798 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.854 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.631 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1654 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1654 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GK208 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 6 March 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1320 | 1359 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 552.2 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.5 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
Quick Sync |