NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.8x more core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 337 MHz
• 23x more texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 1.348 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
• 8.3x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 486 MHz
• 53.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1334 vs 25
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 137

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1334 25
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	243 137

Compare specifications (specs)