AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5809 vs 4264
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2013 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 vs 4264 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 1616
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 1616
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 1704
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 1704
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 223
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1334 vs 608
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 967 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 1704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 vs 223 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1334 vs 608 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 | 4264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1616 | 3520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1616 | 3520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 3334 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 243 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 608 | 1334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | GK107 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1171 | 1174 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 967 MHz |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 941 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |