AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 16% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
  • Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5809 vs 4257
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2013
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5809 vs 4257

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 725 MHz
  • Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 1616
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 1616
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 1704
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 1704
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 223
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1333 vs 608
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 941 MHz vs 725 MHz
Boost clock speed 967 MHz vs 825 MHz
Texture fill rate 30.94 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3520 vs 1616
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3520 vs 1616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 1704
PassMark - G2D Mark 243 vs 223
PassMark - G3D Mark 1333 vs 608

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5809
4257
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1616
3520
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1616
3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1704
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1704
3334
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
223
243
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
608
1333
Name AMD Radeon R7 A360 NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Geekbench - OpenCL 5809 4257
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1616 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1616 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1704 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1704 3334
PassMark - G2D Mark 223 243
PassMark - G3D Mark 608 1333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 461

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 A360 NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Opal GK107
Launch date 5 May 2015 9 January 2013
Place in performance rating 1166 1169
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 825 MHz 967 MHz
Core clock speed 725 MHz 941 MHz
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops 742.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s 30.94 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,270 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 64.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 4012 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus