NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 9.7x more texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
  • 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
  • 29x better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
  • 6.7x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 15.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 85
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 242
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 778
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 778
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 January 2013 vs 1 February 2008
Core clock speed 941 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 30.94 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 16
Floating-point performance 742.7 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz vs 600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1330 vs 85
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 vs 242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 778
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 778

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

  • 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1330
85
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
244
242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3334
778
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3334
778
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
PassMark - G3D Mark 1330 85
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 242
Geekbench - OpenCL 4258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 778
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 778
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 461

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK107 G86
Launch date 9 January 2013 1 February 2008
Place in performance rating 1172 1175
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 967 MHz
Core clock speed 941 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 742.7 gflops 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 384 16
Texture fill rate 30.94 GTexel / s 3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 210 million
CUDA cores 16

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 API 10.0
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 64.19 GB / s 9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz 600 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 GDDR2 / GDDR3
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0