NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 9.7x more texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 29x better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 15.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1329 vs 85
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 778
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 778
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2013 vs 1 February 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1329 vs 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 vs 242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 778 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1329 | 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 | 242 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 778 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G86 |
| Launch date | 9 January 2013 | 1 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1172 | 1175 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 210 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
