AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 243
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 vs 4256
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.551 vs 10.872
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 13.423
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 9 January 2013 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 243 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 vs 4256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 vs 13.423 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1329 vs 520
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 7.005
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.09 vs 144.131
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.144 vs 0.952
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1039
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 1783
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2270
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1039
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 1783
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2270
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 967 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops vs 633.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1329 vs 520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 vs 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 vs 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 vs 0.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 2270 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 1329 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 243 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 4256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.005 | 15.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | 251.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | 1.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | 13.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | 2351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 3520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | 2351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 3520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 3334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Mars | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1171 | 1172 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 967 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 941 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |