AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 243
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 vs 4257
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.551 vs 10.872
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 13.423

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1333 vs 520
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 6.559
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.09 vs 144.131
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.144 vs 0.952
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1039
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 1783
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2270
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1039
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 1783
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2270

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	520 1333
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	488 243
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5532 4257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.559 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	144.131 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.952 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.551 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.696 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1039 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1783 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2270 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1039 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1783 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2270 3334

Compare specifications (specs)