NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 120 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 3x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 140
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 50 vs 28
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 120 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 vs 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 vs 28 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 28 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 | 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 28 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8215 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1140 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1140 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G96 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 4 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1532 | 1533 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 120 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 80 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |