NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 145
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 50 vs 29
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 8 January 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 vs 145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 vs 29 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
- 3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 28 Watt
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 | 145 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 29 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8215 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2744 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2744 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G96 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1529 | 1530 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 96 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | 144 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI | Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | 2-way |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 16 (DDR2) / 25 (GDDR3) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | 8.0 |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |