NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 14.5x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 8.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 6 June 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 97 vs 69
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 vs 69 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 43 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 69 | 97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GT215 | NV44 A2 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 6 June 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1412 | 1415 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $27.99 | |
Price now | $61.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz | 275 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA | 1x DMS-59 |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |