NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 3x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 231
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 1 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 231 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 69
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 vs 69 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 69 | 89 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT215 | G84 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 1 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1412 | 1414 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149.90 | |
| Price now | $149.90 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1249 MHz | 625 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 360 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-II | MXM-HE |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||

