ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V3800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 69

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

• Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 43 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 321
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3123 vs 2958
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3123 vs 2958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI FirePro V3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	321 381
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 69
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 3123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 3123

Compare specifications (specs)