NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
Around 36% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 240 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 772 vs 381
3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 69

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2012 vs 7 January 2010
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops vs 240 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	772 vs 381
PassMark - G2D Mark	249 vs 69

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 45 Watt
4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8210 vs 1754
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3123 vs 2297
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3123 vs 2297

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1249 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	16 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	28 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	8210 vs 1754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3123 vs 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3123 vs 2297

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

772

381

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

249

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1754

8210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

3123

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

3123

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
PassMark - G3D Mark	772	381
PassMark - G2D Mark	249	69
Geekbench - OpenCL	1754	8210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2297	3123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2297	3123

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GK107	GT215
Launch date	1 June 2012	7 January 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.90
Place in performance rating	1409	1412
Price now	$149.90
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	6.18
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1249 MHz
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	240 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s	16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	28 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	727 million
CUDA cores		96
Gigaflops		360
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-II
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
MXM Type		MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management		8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
SLI