NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 1436 MHz vs 540 MHz
  • 4.1x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
  • 12x more pipelines: 96 vs 8
  • 13.3x better floating-point performance: 275.71 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
  • 8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 645 vs 81
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 733
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 733
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 January 2010 vs 4 December 2007
Core clock speed 1436 MHz vs 540 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
Pipelines 96 vs 8
Floating-point performance 275.71 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 256 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 645 vs 81
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 vs 733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 vs 733

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400

  • Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 38 Watt
  • 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 53
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 38 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 160 vs 53

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
645
81
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
53
160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3329
733
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M NVIDIA GeForce 8400
PassMark - G3D Mark 645 81
PassMark - G2D Mark 53 160
Geekbench - OpenCL 11217
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 733

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M NVIDIA GeForce 8400

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla
Code name GT215 G98
Launch date 7 January 2010 4 December 2007
Place in performance rating 1387 1389
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $69.78
Price now $69.78
Value for money (0-100) 1.87

Technical info

Core clock speed 1436 MHz 540 MHz
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 275.71 gflops 20.8 gflops
Gigaflops 413
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 96 8
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s 4.32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 38 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 727 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-II PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 57.6 GB / s 8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 DDR2
Shared memory 0
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management 8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
SLI