NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD FirePro W9000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 975 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 14 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 589
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6138 vs 5062
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 589 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 vs 5062 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD FirePro W9000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 720 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5062 | 6138 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1734.394 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 460.234 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD FirePro W9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 14 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 339 | 342 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 975 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,994 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |