NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 17 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9834 vs 8368
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9834 vs 8368
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 601
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12748 vs 5119
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 vs 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 vs 8368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 601 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12748 vs 5119 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 828 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 | 12748 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 17 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 334 | 332 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,999.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
IntelArc A370M
