NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 876 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8368 vs 8124
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8368 vs 8124
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2413
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2226
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 28 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2226 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 587
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 5057
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 vs 587 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 vs 5057 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 | 639 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5057 | 8905 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK110B |
Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 28 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 339 | 340 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $1,580 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 705 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 | |
Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 672 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |