NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1328 MHz
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1476 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 455

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 May 2018 vs 21 February 2018
Core clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1328 MHz
Boost clock speed	1518 MHz vs 1476 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	587 vs 455

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 8368
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 8368
Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8772 vs 5092

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948 vs 8368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948 vs 8368
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3356
PassMark - G3D Mark	8772 vs 5092

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8368

12948

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8368

12948

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3358

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

587

455

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5092

8772

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8368	12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8368	12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3358
PassMark - G2D Mark	587	455
PassMark - G3D Mark	5092	8772
Geekbench - OpenCL		34276
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Code name	GP107	GP104
Launch date	21 May 2018	21 February 2018
Place in performance rating	335	336
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1518 MHz	1476 MHz
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	1328 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		3,098 gflops
Pipelines		1280
Texture fill rate		96.8 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	7012 MHz
Maximum RAM amount		6 GB
Memory bandwidth		168.3 GB / s
Memory bus width		192 Bit
Memory type		GDDR5