NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 7.3x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 20.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 244
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 273
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 11 August 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 244 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 273 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | 244 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 121 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Curie |
| Code name | GP107 | G70 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 11 August 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $449 |
| Place in performance rating | 598 | 597 |
| Price now | $124.99 | $80 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | 3.16 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 302 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 226 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
ATIFireMV 2400 PCIe x1
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
