NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 7 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 67.209
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.769 vs 799.414
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 30.523
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 223.683
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 vs 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.769 vs 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 vs 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 vs 223.683 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 67.802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 1230.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 81.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 370.179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 121 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 7 March 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 598 | 600 |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 279 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |