NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 29.1x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 457.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 11
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 283
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 1 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 11 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 283 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | 11 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | 283 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 121 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Rage 9 |
| Code name | GP107 | RV380 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 1 January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 598 | 595 |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 170 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
ATIFireMV 2400 PCIe x1
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
