NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 723 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6322 vs 5150
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 65.777
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 820.138
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2045
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3144
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2045
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3144

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X

• Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 648
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26899 vs 20734
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.142 vs 5.071
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.754 vs 24.676
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 386.418 vs 301.168

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6322 5150
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	648 832
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20734 26899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3144

Compare specifications (specs)