AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 1392 MHz
7093.7x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 7 GB/s
6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 20733

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 Aug 2021 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Boost clock speed	1975 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate	474.0 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3840 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	125290 vs 20733

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

5.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 400 Watt
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2786
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2786
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2243
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2243

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 400 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687 vs 2786
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687 vs 2786
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336 vs 2243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336 vs 2243

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2786

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2786

3687

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2243

3336

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2243

3336

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

125290

20733

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2786	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2786	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2243	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2243	3336
Geekbench - OpenCL	125290	20733
PassMark - G3D Mark		6325
PassMark - G2D Mark		649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		8496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		305

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 21	GP107
Launch date	3 Aug 2021	25 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$4999	$139
Place in performance rating	497	494
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		46.07
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1975 MHz	1392 MHz
Compute units	60
Core clock speed	1800 MHz	1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	948.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	30.34 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	15.17 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3840	768
Pixel fill rate	189.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	474.0 GTexel/s	66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	400 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	26800 million	3,300 million
CUDA cores		768
Floating-point performance		2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	145 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	800 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Quad-slot
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)	7 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready