NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 3,625 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9771 vs 6172
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 339
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 9390
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 3260
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 9390
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 3,625 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9771 vs 6172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 vs 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 vs 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1152
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1152 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9771 | 6172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 9390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3260 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP106 | GM204 |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 371 | 372 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 930 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |