NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39133 vs 32370
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 115.073
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 8.057
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 31.946
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 425.709
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 10566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 10566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 317 vs 157

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9784 vs 7881
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 771 vs 568
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 vs 1316.075

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 9784
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	568 771
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39133 32370
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 115.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1325.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 8.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 31.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 425.709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	317 157

Compare specifications (specs)