NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
• Around 22% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9762 vs 4901
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 369
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 68.324
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 6.491
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 344.551
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 7062
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

• Around 56% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1152
• 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1463.376 vs 1325.07
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.133 vs 31.946
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3697
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3338
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3697
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3338

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9762 4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	772 369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.073 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1325.07 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.057 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.946 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	425.709 344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10566 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3697 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10566 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3697 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 13032

Compare specifications (specs)